netdev - [ROSE] 2.6.29 rose patch missing in 2.6.30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A3E0EB2.7020106@free.fr>
Date:	Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:42:58 +0200
From:	Bernard Pidoux F6BVP <f6bvp@...e.fr>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [ROSE] 2.6.29 rose patch missing in 2.6.30

Hi David,

Problems with ROSE protocol came back with 2.6.30 kernel.
I discovered the reason.
Rose patch I submitted in November was applied in kernels until 2.6.29.4.
However this patch is not present in 2.6.30.

Is there any reason ?

Here are the reference to my patch and your acceptance message :

List:       linux-netdev
Subject:    [PATCH] [ROSE] zero length frame filtering in af_rose.c
From:       Bernard Pidoux <bernard.pidoux () upmc ! fr>
Date:       2008-11-24 21:49:40
Message-ID: 492B2174.1030503 () upmc ! fr
-----------
List:       linux-hams
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] [ROSE] zero length frame filtering in af_rose.c
From:       David Miller <davem () davemloft ! net>
Date:       2008-11-25 8:57:50
Message-ID: 20081125.005750.41495501.davem () davemloft ! net
[Download message RAW]


Patch applied, thank you.
--

Regards,


Bernard Pidoux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html