[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090623025459.GA5991@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:54:59 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>
Cc: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of
queueing an extra skb.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:25:29AM -0700, Matt Carlson wrote:
>
> As was said elsewhere, from the driver writer's perspective every packet
> that has already been submitted (queued) to the hardware cannot be
> preempted. Slightly extending that logic doesn't seem like that much of
> a problem, especially if it saves the troublesome requeuing logic higher up.
I think this is pretty much the same as returning TX_BUSY :)
Do you have access to one of these buggy cards? Can you run some
tests to see what the difference between TSO and GSO is on them?
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists