[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090624182734.GA14306@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:27:34 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>,
Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] gianfar: Fix half-duplex operation for non-MII/RMII
interfaces
It appears that gianfar driver has the same problem[1] that I
just fixed for ucc_geth.
NFS boot using 10/half link takes about 10 minutes to complete:
eth0: Gianfar Ethernet Controller Version 1.2, 00:11:22:33:44:55
eth0: Running with NAPI enabled
eth0: 256/256 RX/TX BD ring size
[...]
Sending DHCP requests .
PHY: mdio@...24520:02 - Link is Up - 10/Half
., OK
[...]
Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 10.0.0.2
Looking up port of RPC 100005/1 on 10.0.0.2
VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) readonly on device 0:11.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 188k init
nfs: server 10.0.0.2 not responding, still trying
nfs: server 10.0.0.2 OK
nfs: server 10.0.0.2 not responding, still trying
nfs: server 10.0.0.2 not responding, still trying
nfs: server 10.0.0.2 not responding, still trying
[... few minutes of OK/not responding flood ...]
And just as with ucc_geth, statistic shows errors:
# ethtool -S eth0 | grep -v ": 0"
NIC statistics:
rx-dropped-by-kernel: 2
tx-rx-64-frames: 49
tx-rx-65-127-frames: 1270
tx-rx-128-255-frames: 9992
tx-rx-256-511-frames: 75
tx-rx-512-1023-frames: 142
tx-rx-1024-1518-frames: 8828
rx-bytes: 13299414
rx-packets: 13122
rx-jabber-frames: 9
tx-byte-counter: 1284847
tx-packets: 8115
tx-broadcast-packets: 3
tx-deferral-packets: 43
tx-single-collision-packets: 15
tx-multiple-collision-packets: 301
tx-late-collision-packets: 872
tx-total-collision: 999
tx-undersize-frames: 6
The symptoms were observed on MPC8379E-RDB boards (eTSEC). Although
I didn't find where documentation forbids clearing Full Duplex bit
for non-MII/RMII modes, it's pretty distinct that the bit should be
set.
It's no wonder though, QE Ethernet and TSEC are pretty similar.
[1] http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-June/073631.html
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
---
drivers/net/gianfar.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
index 8741bb0..15dbffa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -1984,13 +1984,16 @@ static void adjust_link(struct net_device *dev)
if (phydev->link) {
u32 tempval = gfar_read(®s->maccfg2);
u32 ecntrl = gfar_read(®s->ecntrl);
+ phy_interface_t phyi = phydev->interface;
/* Now we make sure that we can be in full duplex mode.
* If not, we operate in half-duplex mode. */
if (phydev->duplex != priv->oldduplex) {
new_state = 1;
- if (!(phydev->duplex))
- tempval &= ~(MACCFG2_FULL_DUPLEX);
+ if (!phydev->duplex &&
+ (phyi == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII ||
+ phyi == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII))
+ tempval &= ~MACCFG2_FULL_DUPLEX;
else
tempval |= MACCFG2_FULL_DUPLEX;
--
1.6.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists