[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625095953.GC29980@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:59:53 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
	paulus@...ba.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, jengelh@...ozas.de,
	r000n@...0n.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:03:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >  include/linux/rcuclassic.h    |   15 ++-
> > 
> > heh, we dont have this file anymore ... as of today, right? :)
> 
> Ah, I was assuming that expedited RCU would happen before removal 
> of Classic RCU.
Our general preference is to zap code.
/me stares at:
  $ git diff --stat -M v2.6.30..v2.6.31-rc1 | tail -1
  7743 files changed, 782278 insertions(+), 403162 deletions(-)
/me corrects himself:
Okay, so the zapping of code is the divine guiding principle we've 
been following for 15 years. Ending up with a kernel that is 11 
million lines of code is a small imperfection of mankind and is to 
be fixed.
	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists