[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625095953.GC29980@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:59:53 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
paulus@...ba.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, jengelh@...ozas.de,
r000n@...0n.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:03:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > include/linux/rcuclassic.h | 15 ++-
> >
> > heh, we dont have this file anymore ... as of today, right? :)
>
> Ah, I was assuming that expedited RCU would happen before removal
> of Classic RCU.
Our general preference is to zap code.
/me stares at:
$ git diff --stat -M v2.6.30..v2.6.31-rc1 | tail -1
7743 files changed, 782278 insertions(+), 403162 deletions(-)
/me corrects himself:
Okay, so the zapping of code is the divine guiding principle we've
been following for 15 years. Ending up with a kernel that is 11
million lines of code is a small imperfection of mankind and is to
be fixed.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists