lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19012.37515.146191.198843@robur.slu.se>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:19:07 +0200
From:	Robert Olsson <robert@...ur.slu.se>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Staszewski?= 
	<pstaszewski@...are.pl>, Robert Olsson <robert.olsson@....uu.se>,
	Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits


Jarek Poplawski writes:

 > >> oprofile: using NMI interrupt.
 > >> Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits
 > >> Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits
 > >> Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits
 > >> Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits
 > >> Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits
 > >> Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits

 > On the other hand, even if there is no problem with memory, it seems
 > because of hitting max_resize the threshold should be changed, e.g.
 > by reverting the patch below.

 You seem to have some temporary memory problem. So the printout might be
 a bit misleading in this case. We really like to keep the root node as big 
 as we can to keep the tree as flat as possible for performance reasons.
 (We're even more motivated now when we can disable the route cache)

 So I'll guess the next insert/delete inflates the root node to be within
 the interval. So I'll assume this just a temporary failure?

 I would be nice to have *threshholds* settable by /proc or /sys. I would
 use this in the other direction to trade memory for even faster lookups. 
 
 But maybe experts memory allocation has some good suggestions.

 Cheers.
					--ro
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ