[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090629092703.GB4712@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:27:03 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Robert Olsson <robert@...ur.slu.se>,
Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>,
"Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]" <jorge@...2.net>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Robert Olsson <robert.olsson@....uu.se>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rib_trie / Fix inflate_threshold_root. Now=15 size=11 bits
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:47:44AM +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote:
> But
> With all this patches i have the same problem with CPU load
> Every time when route cache entries are purged cpu load is increasing
> from 1% to 40 / 80% it depends
>
> I see that on 64bit machine when route cache entries are going down i
> have almost 80% load on each cpu where ethernet card is binded by
> smp_affinity
> But on 32bit machine cpu load reported by mpstat is half that on 64bit
> machine
> here is example from 32bit machine ( mpstat + rtstat -k entries )
>
> Linux 2.6.29.5 (TM_02_C1) 06/29/09 _i686_ (2 CPU)
>
> 12:36:54 CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal
> %guest %idle RT CACHE ENTRIES (from rtstat)
> 12:36:57 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51 15.08 0.00
> 0.00 83.42 83346
I guess Eric is thinking about this. Btw., two little suggestions:
it should be easier to track if these route cache reports stay in its
starting thread ("weird problem"?), and if you could send these
stats/logs as attachements or turn off line wrapping, please? ;-)
Thanks,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists