[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090630064022.GA5589@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:40:22 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Staszewski?=
<pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: weird problem
On 26-06-2009 19:45, Pawe. Staszewski wrote:
> Eric Dumazet pisze:
...
>> Pawel made some reports errors in fib thread, so I am not sure he really
>> tried 2.6.30 and had same oprofile results.
>>
>> rt_worker_func() taking 13% of cpu0 is an alarm for me :)
>> And 21% of cpu0 and 34% of cpu6 taken by oprofiled seems odd too...
>>
>> Pawel, could you give us :
>>
>> grep . /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/*
>> cat /proc/interrupts
>>
>> on your various kernels (previous to 2.6.29, 2.6.29, 2.6.30, ...)
>>
>> I suspect a change in hash table size, and/or change in interrupt affinities...
Btw., Pawel these eth0's don't look like affined or I miss something?
Jarek P.
...
>
> cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 CPU4
> CPU5 CPU6 CPU7
...
> 29: 1139988 18351004 89662 3 0
> 1 0 3 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> 30: 0 2 20221692 1 0
> 3 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
...
> second machine:
> Linux TM_02_C1 2.6.30 #1 SMP Thu Jun 25 21:49:58 CEST 2009 i686 Intel(R)
> Xeon(R) CPU 3075 @ 2.66GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>
> cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1
...
> 28: 13482 11260 PCI-MSI-edge eth2
> 29: 3 1326457765 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
> 30: 1240943198 137973134 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists