[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0906302211300.25417@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:16:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, markmc@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: make bridge-nf-call-*tables default
configurable
On Tuesday 2009-06-30 21:06, David Miller wrote:
>Adding appropriate lists and persons to CC:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:27:47PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>>>
>>> However, because nf_conntrack introduces an skb_orphan(), it is now
>>> recommended that bridge-nf-call-iptables be disabled completely so as
>>> to ensure features like TUNSETSNDBUF work as expected.
>>
>> Patrick, does conntrack ever make sense for bridging? Perhaps
>> we should get rid of that completely?
It makes sense absolutely. Consider:
* packet enters bridge
* NF_HOOK(PF_INET6, NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING, ...) is called by nr_netfilter.c
* (connection tracking entry is set up)
* let bridging decision be "local delivery"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists