[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090701041034.GA29980@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:10:35 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, markmc@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: make bridge-nf-call-*tables default
configurable
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 05:50:18AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On secondary thought, one could also argue that because conntrack
> ignores the interface, two unrelated connections happening to be routed
> through the same machine(*) are tracked as one, too.
Good point. We really should make these risks much more explicit.
However, I still think the risk with bridging is higher, especially
in the presence of virtualisation. Consider the scenario where you
have to VMs on the one host, each with a dedicated bridge with the
intention that neither should know anything about the other's
traffic.
With conntrack running as part of bridging, the traffic can now
cross over which is a serious security hole.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists