[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A4B24DE.10103@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:57:02 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: make bridge-nf-call-*tables default configurable
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:27:47PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> However, because nf_conntrack introduces an skb_orphan(), it is now
>> recommended that bridge-nf-call-iptables be disabled completely so as
>> to ensure features like TUNSETSNDBUF work as expected.
>
> Patrick, does conntrack ever make sense for bridging? Perhaps
> we should get rid of that completely?
People are apparently using this for stateful tracking and even
NAT on bridges, so I'm afraid we can't get rid of it completely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists