netdev - Re: [PATCH] bridge: make bridge-nf-call-*tables default configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090701.090849.31764824.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	kaber@...sh.net
Cc:	markmc@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: make bridge-nf-call-*tables default
 configurable

From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:05:40 +0200

> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:51:06 +0200
>> 
>>> I agree, this has already caused an endless amount of problems for
>>> users due to the unexpected behaviour and, in some cases, bugs.
>>>
>>> Dave's point is certainly valid as well, until we change the defaults,
>>> distributions can use sysctl.conf. But I think we should move towards
>>> changing the defaults.
>> You must do this via something like your suggestion, the
>> feature-removal-schedule.txt thing.
> 
> Yes, of course. But I prefer the runtime warning (at least on top),
> my feeling is not many people actually read feature-removal-schedule.

Ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html