netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 9/9] vxge: Version update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:27:03 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Sreenivasa Honnur <Sreenivasa.Honnur@...erion.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, support@...erion.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 9/9] vxge: Version update

Sreenivasa Honnur a écrit :
> - Version update
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sreenivasa Honnur <sreenivasa.honnur@...erion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkrishna Vepa <ram.vepa@...erion.com>
> ---
> diff -urpN patch_8/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-version.h patch_9/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-version.h
> --- patch_8/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-version.h	2009-06-30 12:14:09.000000000 +0530
> +++ patch_9/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-version.h	2009-06-30 12:47:50.000000000 +0530
> @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@
>  #define VXGE_VERSION_MAJOR	"2"
>  #define VXGE_VERSION_MINOR	"0"
>  #define VXGE_VERSION_FIX	"4"
> -#define VXGE_VERSION_BUILD	"17795"
> +#define VXGE_VERSION_BUILD	"17899"
>  #define VXGE_VERSION_FOR	"k"
>  #endif
> 

Just curious, why do you change only BUILD, after all previous changes
that seem quite important, like requiring a new firmware (see patch 7/9) and or
fixing crash issues ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html