netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 2/2] memory barrier: adding smp_mb__after

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090703074126.GB2902@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:41:26 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	fbl@...hat.com, nhorman@...hat.com, davem@...hat.com,
	htejun@...il.com, jarkao2@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/2] memory barrier: adding smp_mb__after_lock

On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:39:04AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > Jiri Olsa a écrit :
> > > Adding smp_mb__after_lock define to be used as a smp_mb call after
> > > a lock.  
> > > 
> > > Making it nop for x86, since {read|write|spin}_lock() on x86 are 
> > > full memory barriers.
> > > 
> > > wbr,
> > > jirka
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> > 
> > 
> > Maybe we should remind that sk_has_helper() is always called
> > right after a call to read_lock() as in :
> > 
> > 	read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> > 	if (sk_has_sleeper(sk))
> > 		wake_up_interruptible_all(sk->sk_sleep);
> 
> Agreed, that'd be to have it in the source code comment.
> 
> 
> - Davide
> 

ok, I'll add it to the 1/2 part in v5

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html