[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m163e9e0mg.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:46:15 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict verification
Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb> writes:
> On Friday 03 July 2009 23:20:05 David Miller wrote:
>
>> I really never should have applied your initial patch, I severely
>> regret it. Thanksfully it's reverted now and we can look into
>> this issue more properly.
> If it was said before...
>
> Then maybe i will try to do some new sysctl value?
>
> By default it will be old behavior, but it can be changed to new on user
> choice.
>
> Let's say
>
> net.ipv4.arp_proxy_gateway
> net.ipv4.arp_proxy_gratuitous
How do machines with addresses without routes to them
get packets from machines in other subnets?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists