[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A51FFDD.30108@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:45:01 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] sctp: fix warning at inet_sock_destruct() while release
sctp socket
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:45:48PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
>> Commit 'net: Move rx skb_orphan call to where needed' broken sctp protocol
>> with warning at inet_sock_destruct(). Actually, sctp can do this right with
>> sctp_sock_rfree_frag() and sctp_skb_set_owner_r_frag() pair.
>>
>> sctp_sock_rfree_frag(skb);
>> sctp_skb_set_owner_r_frag(skb, newsk);
>>
>> This patch not revert the commit d55d87fdff8252d0e2f7c28c2d443aee17e9d70f,
>> instead remove the sctp_sock_rfree_frag() function.
>
> It took me a while to understand your patch but yeah it does seem
> to be the right fix. So essentially we were freeing the packet
> twice as my newly added skb_orphan in sctp_skb_set_owner_r is
> repeating what sctp_sock_rfree_frag has already done for the
> migration case.
>
> While your patch simply eliminates sctp_sock_rfree_frag so that
> we only free things once.
>
Yep, I agree.
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
>
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
>
> Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists