netdev - Re: Debounce code vs. dma_sync_single_range_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	khc@...waw.pl
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Debounce code vs. dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu() and e100
 driver.

From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:01:54 +0200

> Maybe you apply the workaround for 2.6.31 and I (or someone) will
> convert e100 to coherent allocs for packet descriptors, post-31?

I think that's a good plan.

Will give a few days for Intel folks to chime in before applying
your patch for 2.6.31, but otherwise that's my plan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html