[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m18wioxjmg.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:01:43 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, xemul@...nvz.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: VETH patch to zero timestamp.
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> writes:
> The patch below helps when using VETH and bridge(s)
> This makes sure that the pkt timestamp is properly (re)calculated on
> receiving the packet on the peer veth device.
>
> I'm sure this patch is white-space damaged. If this looks
> useful, I'll generate a clean patch and send as attachment.
We reset everything else that needs to be reset. So we might as well
reset the timestamps as well. Unless there is a big performance
impact by doing so.
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> index 1097c72..e9136af 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> @@ -170,7 +173,12 @@ static int veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>
> if (skb->len > (rcv->mtu + MTU_PAD))
> goto rx_drop;
> -
> +
> + /* Zero out the time-stamp so that receiving code is forced
> + * to recalculate it.
> + */
> + skb->tstamp.tv64 = 0;
> +
> skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, rcv);
> if (dev->features & NETIF_F_NO_CSUM)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists