[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090717093307.GB3150@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:33:07 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v4] fs_enet/mii-fec.c: fix MII speed calculation
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:42:25PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> The MII speed calculation was based on the CPU clock (ppc_proc_freq),
> but for MPC512x we must use the bus clock instead.
>
> This patch makes it use the correct clock and makes sure we don't
> clobber reserved bits in the MII_SPEED register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
> Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@...x.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c b/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c
> index 75a0999..62b2d7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c
> @@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ static int fs_enet_fec_mii_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
> static int __devinit fs_enet_mdio_probe(struct of_device *ofdev,
> const struct of_device_id *match)
> {
> - struct device_node *np = NULL;
> struct resource res;
> struct mii_bus *new_bus;
> struct fec_info *fec;
> - int ret = -ENOMEM, i;
> + int (*get_bus_freq)(struct device_node *) = match->data;
> + int ret = -ENOMEM, clock, speed;
>
> new_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
> if (!new_bus)
> @@ -133,13 +133,34 @@ static int __devinit fs_enet_mdio_probe(struct of_device *ofdev,
> if (!fec->fecp)
> goto out_fec;
>
> - fec->mii_speed = ((ppc_proc_freq + 4999999) / 5000000) << 1;
> + if (get_bus_freq) {
> + clock = get_bus_freq(ofdev->node);
> +
> + if (!clock) {
> + dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "could not determine IPS/IPB clock\n");
> + goto out_unmap_regs;
> + }
> + } else
> + clock = ppc_proc_freq;
> +
> + /* scale for a MII clock <= 2.5 MHz */
> + speed = (clock + 2499999) / 2500000;
> +
> + /* only 6 bits (25:30) available for MII speed */
> + if (speed > 0x3F) {
> + speed = 0x3F;
> + dev_err(&ofdev->dev,
> + "MII clock (%d Hz) exceeds max (2.5 MHz)\n",
> + clock / speed);
> + }
> +
> + fec->mii_speed = speed << 1;
>
> setbits32(&fec->fecp->fec_r_cntrl, FEC_RCNTRL_MII_MODE);
> setbits32(&fec->fecp->fec_ecntrl, FEC_ECNTRL_PINMUX |
> FEC_ECNTRL_ETHER_EN);
> out_be32(&fec->fecp->fec_ievent, FEC_ENET_MII);
> - out_be32(&fec->fecp->fec_mii_speed, fec->mii_speed);
> + clrsetbits_be32(&fec->fecp->fec_mii_speed, 0x7E, fec->mii_speed);
>
> new_bus->phy_mask = ~0;
> new_bus->irq = kmalloc(sizeof(int) * PHY_MAX_ADDR, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -188,6 +209,12 @@ static struct of_device_id fs_enet_mdio_fec_match[] = {
> {
> .compatible = "fsl,pq1-fec-mdio",
> },
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_MPC512x)
> + {
> + .compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-fec-mdio",
> + .data = mpc5xxx_get_bus_frequency,
> + },
> +#endif
Grepping through 'drivers/*' I see that #ifdefing compatible-entries is highly
uncommon (just 3 hits). I think a guideline would be useful. Most people like
to avoid #ifdefs at any cost, while I personally think it doesn't spoil
readability too much here. Other opinions?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists