[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090720.034328.193709571.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Phonet: sockets list through proc_fs
From: "RĂ©mi Denis-Courmont" <remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:32:04 +0300
> On Monday 20 July 2009 13:21:01 ext Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>> > It's just like most network protocols exposing their sockets list in
>> > /proc/net. Debugging/monitoring indeed.
>>
>> I think that for new protocols, we should not do this anymore and just
>> use debugfs. Since that is exactly its job.
>
> Requiring debugfs for something like 'netstat' sounds restrictive to me...
Me too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists