netdev - Re: [PATCH] TCP: Add comments to (near) all functions in tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A646742.90200@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:46:58 +0800
From:	Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP: Add comments to (near) all functions in	tcp_output.c
 v2

Andi Kleen said:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:06:53PM +0800, Shan Wei wrote:
>> Andi Kleen said:
>>>  
>>> +/* Compute TCP options for ESTABLISHED sockets. This is not the
>>> + * final wire format yet.
>>> + */
>> typo, “network wire”?
> 
> I don't see a typo.

Just see the comment about tcp_syn_options().
"wire" vs "network wire".

> 
>>
>>> +/* Test if sending is allowed right now.
>>> + */
>>>  int tcp_may_send_now(struct sock *sk)
>> Is it better to provide the condition be allowed?
> 
> Such a introductionary comment is not intended to be a full
> representation of the code, just a overview.
> 

OK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html