[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907221407.29275.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:07:28 +0300
From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont"
<remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com>
To: ext Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
ext Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB host CDC Phonet network interface driver
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 12:15:34 ext Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> > > The AT stuff is really problematic. Look at the hoops ISDN and software
> > > modem drivers go through to emulate AT commands. I know even of a
> > > CDC-ACM modem which can't deal with AT commands inline (that's within
> > > spec). It seems to me we should have a modem API in kernel.
> >
> > For devices which don't deal in AT commands probably but for devices
> > whose firmware provides an AT command interface over serial I would
> > disagree.
>
> I fully agree here. Even if you think you get AT commands under control,
> you really won't in the end. That standard is so wildly mis-interpreted
> that it is not even funny anymore.
Possibly. Does anyone known of any "species" bypassing AT commands entirely,
other than Phonet? as far as GPRS is concerned?
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
Nokia Devices R&D, Maemo Software, Helsinki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists