[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090722134557.2457c5f5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:45:57 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@...il.com
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 13760] New: 2.6.30 kernel locks up with pppoe
in back trace (regression)
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 06:10:00 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13760
>
> Summary: 2.6.30 kernel locks up with pppoe in back trace
> (regression)
> Product: Networking
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.30
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: acme@...stprotocols.net
> ReportedBy: for.poige+bugzilla.kernel.org@...il.com
> Regression: Yes
>
>
> Having updated kernel to 2.6.30 (and 2.6.30.1) I've faced several lock-ups
> during boot sequence (and even during shutdown), when pppoe connection had been
> initiated (and interrupted on shutdown). The lock-ups aren't Alt_SysRq_B
> breakable.
>
> I still not have backtraces saved but as soon as pppoe connection initiation
> runs before running X-server (and after its shutdown), I have seen parts of
> dmesg's output and to my surprise it was regarding pppoe's functions.
>
This regression report is nearly two weeks old and I think there has
been a bit of ppp-related fixing going on in that time.
Can you please tell us whether the regression is still present in
2.6.30.2? If so, I expect we'll be wanting to see those traces,
please.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists