[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090723.100124.169341665.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kaber@...sh.net
Cc: sarveshwarb@...verengines.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] be2net: Adding support for 802.1ad (q-in-q mode)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:33:05 +0200
> David Miller wrote:
>>> Sarveshwar Bandi wrote:
>>>> The outer vlan is totally transparent to the host. It is used by the NIC
>>>> to demux packets across multiple pci network functions. Currently the
>>>> outer vlan tags are configured on the NIC by OEM provided utilities.
>>> I see. A proper changelog entry would have explained that and avoided
>>> all this confusion. Not that I think using another tool for this is a
>>> good solution, but no objections from a functional POV.
>>
>> Using OEM tools makes no sense, there should be something like an
>> ethtool interface for changing this setting and appropriate changes
>> to the common userland tools to provide access to them.
>>
>> I'm not putting this change in until there is common infrastructure
>> submitted to common tools to control this configuration.
>
> Thanks, thats my opinion as well. But I think we should handle
> Q-in-Q using the VLAN netlink API and iproute instead of ethtool
> for consistency.
That works for me too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists