[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907241514.18871.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:14:17 +0300
From: "Rémi Denis-Courmont"
<remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com>
To: ext Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
ext Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB host CDC Phonet network interface driver
On Friday 24 July 2009 15:01:19 ext Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 22. Juli 2009 11:15:34 schrieb Marcel Holtmann:
> > > > The AT stuff is really problematic. Look at the hoops ISDN and
> > > > software modem drivers go through to emulate AT commands. I know even
> > > > of a CDC-ACM modem which can't deal with AT commands inline (that's
> > > > within spec). It seems to me we should have a modem API in kernel.
> > >
> > > For devices which don't deal in AT commands probably but for devices
> > > whose firmware provides an AT command interface over serial I would
> > > disagree.
> >
> > I fully agree here. Even if you think you get AT commands under control,
> > you really won't in the end. That standard is so wildly mis-interpreted
> > that it is not even funny anymore.
>
> For these devices we could at least separate the data channel from the
> control channel.
"These" as in AT devices? You want a line discipline to multiplex AT commands
inspite of PPP? I wonder if that'd work.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
Nokia Devices R&D, Maemo Software, Helsinki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists