netdev - Re: Jumbo frame question...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090724184552.GA2991@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:45:52 -0400
From:	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Jumbo frame question...

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:39:43AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> In so far as there is no de jure spec for Jumbo Frames, it is rather 
> difficult to have a spec violation :).
>
> Not a case of too much rope?  Given that (IIRC) Jumbo Frame was not 
> introduced in Ethernet NICs until Gigabit came along (eg Alteon), the 
> chances a (legacy) 100 Mbit/s network would have JF-capable NICs is 
> epsilon.

Nothing would prevent you from using a 100Mbit fiber PHY on a gigabit
capable network port, so you could have a 100Mbit port that supported
jumbo frames.

-- 
Len Sorensen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html