[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A6BA3CE.9000607@ziu.info>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:31:10 +0200
From: Michal Soltys <soltys@....info>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: r8169 (+others ?) and note_interrupt performance hit on 2.6.30.x
I've noticed, that on 2.6.30 kernels I took serious performance
hit compared to e.g. 2.6.28.10 (didn't check 2.6.29 ones).
Generally, with trivial nc -u other_host </dev/zero
- so ~ 1KB packets and 1gbit speed I went from:
01:30:25 AM CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %idle
01:30:26 AM all 0.91 0.00 8.68 0.00 2.28 7.31 0.00 0.00 80.82
01:30:26 AM 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
01:30:26 AM 1 1.68 0.00 15.13 0.00 5.04 13.45 0.00 0.00 64.71
running at full 1gbit speed with ease, to:
01:35:26 AM CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %idle
01:35:27 AM all 0.50 0.00 12.56 0.00 24.12 12.56 0.00 0.00 50.25
01:35:27 AM 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
01:35:27 AM 1 2.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 48.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
struggling at ~90MB/s (standard pfifo_fast)
Both netcat and interface interrupt were pinned at the same (2nd) core.
I did some quick oprofile, and noticed one new call -
note_interrupt - which wasn't present in the earlier kernel,
taking majority of the cpu time, relatively to the rest, e.g.:
samples cum. samples % cum. % symbol name
90984 90984 42.8695 42.8695 note_interrupt
The hardware is regular 32bit x86:
GA-MA74GM-S2H
AMD 4850e (2.5ghz)
onboard r8169
Both kernels with identical configuration, and tests done on idle machine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists