[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090726.094402.38463748.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 09:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: robert.w.love@...el.com
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...n-fcoe.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] [net-next-2.6 PATCH 5/5] fcoe: Use
NETIF_F_FCOE_MTU flag to set up max frame size (lport->mfs)
From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:48:03 -0700
> Yes, absolutely, but it's only this small patch that creates the
> dependency. I figured that all of the other fcoe patches could go into
> James' scsi-misc tree and get merged first. Then this one could go into
> his scsi-post-merge tree and depend on net-next.
>
> It's really up to you and James, I just thought that would be easier.
So I tried to apply just the networking bits but none of the ixgbe
parts apply properly to net-next-2.6, so this patch series will
need to be respun and resubmitted in it's entirety so I can
apply it properly.
It seems that the ixgbe driver now maintains feature flags differently
than whatever revision of the driver these patches were generated
against.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists