[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0907272037500.20984@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:40:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: Hannes Eder <heder@...gle.com>
cc: lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] libxt_ipvs: user space lib for netfilter matcher
xt_ipvs
On Monday 2009-07-27 15:48, Hannes Eder wrote:
>+
>+ switch (c) {
>+ case '0': /* --ipvs */
>+ /* Nothing to do here. */
Then why add it?
>+ char buf[BUFSIZ];
>+
>+ if (family == NFPROTO_IPV4) {
>+ if (!numeric && addr->ip == 0) {
>+ printf("anywhere ");
>+ return;
>+ }
>+ if (numeric)
>+ strcpy(buf, xtables_ipaddr_to_numeric(&addr->in));
>+ else
>+ strcpy(buf, xtables_ipaddr_to_anyname(&addr->in));
>+ strcat(buf, xtables_ipmask_to_numeric(&mask->in));
>+ printf("%s ", buf);
There is no need to use the strcpy/strcat hacks. Just directly printf it.
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/extensions/libxt_ipvs.man
>@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>+ipvs tests where the packet was modified by IPVS, i.e. is the
>+skb_buff->ipvs_property set.
>+.TP
>+[\fB!\fP] \fB--ipvs
>+Does the packet have to IPVS property?
>+
>+TODO: Write proper documentation.
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists