[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <loom.20090727T214746-75@post.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:50:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: Todd Merritt <tmerritt@...il.arizona.edu>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ixgbe: panic in ixgbe_clean_rx_irq()
Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr <at> intel.com> writes:
>
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 17:21 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > I'm going to run a test with a no-preempt kernel over night...
> >
> > The no-preempt kernel has been stable for 17 hours, while running a four
> > times 10GbE pktgen load test (using 1024 bytes packets).
> >
> > Kernel git version (git describe):
> > v2.6.31-rc1-932-g8e321c4
> >
> > Git ("git log e594e96..8e321c4 drivers/net/ixgbe") reports not changes
> > to the ixgbe driver between these two kernel versions.
>
> Thanks for the additional info Jesper. This is definately a good data
> point. I'm not sure where to go with the preemption debugging at this
> point with our driver under heavy load. We're still trying to repro here.
> I'll keep digging around though in the meantime.
>
> This is the second preemption-induced bug from ixgbe we've had reported in
> a few days. Eek!
>
We're getting a panic in the same function with the stable version of the ixgbe
driver 2.0.38.2-1 on redhat 5 kernel-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5. Is there a dev
release of the driver that might have a fix in it ?
Thanks,
Todd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists