netdev - Re: [question] bridged tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090728084330.GC6522@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:43:31 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	Philip Craig <philipc@...pgear.com>
Cc:	Rémi Denis-Courmont 
	<remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [question] bridged tunnel

Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:28:05AM CEST, philipc@...pgear.com wrote:
>Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Well generally there could be anything (e.g. internet) in between ROUTER A and
>> B. That's why.
>
>If the internet is in the middle, then you don't want to invent your own
>tunneling.  Using something like OpenVPN in tap mode, or gretap over IPSec.
>

I would like to avoid overhead that openvpn and ipsec adds. In my case only few
routers are in the middle.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html