[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A6F0FC2.1060605@hartkopp.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:48:34 +0200
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: Socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] CAN: Add Flexcan CAN controller driver
Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:12:10PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>>> Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (frame->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)
>>>>>> + dlc |= MB_CNT_RTR;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + writel(dlc, ®s->cantxfg[TX_BUF_ID].can_dlc);
>>>>>> + writel(can_id, ®s->cantxfg[TX_BUF_ID].can_id);
>> Are you sure, that this is correct?
>
> Yes, I am sure, at least on my hardware.
I looked into the writel() macro which does a cpu_to_le32() to the value -
sorry that i did not check this before ...
>
>> Indeed i wonder, if it would make sense to skip the entire struct flexcan_mb
>> approach and fiddle byte-by-byte inside the registers ...
>
> You'll have to to 32 bit accesses to get it right on little and big
> endian.
>
> what we can do is:
>
> writel(can_data[0] << 24 | can_data[1] << 16 | can_data[2] << 8 | can_data[3],
> msg_buf + 0x8);
This looks easier to understand and makes things clear, when you look into the
specification.
Regards,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists