netdev - Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Don't run __qdisc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090729110436.GA5490@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:04:36 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Don't run __qdisc_run() on a stopped TX queue

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:44:28AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:59:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > The premise is that there'd be only one.  The qdisc lock.
> > 
> > If the traffic is distributed, flow wise, the driver XMIT
> > lock would spread due to multiqueue.
> 
> Suppose that we have a single large flow going through that has
> filled up the hardware queue and is now backlogged in the qdisc
> with qdisc_run on CPU A.   Now some other flow comes along and
> sends a packet on CPU B.
> 
> So now CPU A and B will both be processing packets for the first
> flow causing loads of lock contention.
> 
> But worse yet, we have introduced packet reordering.  So are you
> convinced now :)

How about this: instead of the _RUNNING flag we take tx lock while
holding qdisc lock and release qdisc lock just after (before xmit).
This should prevent reordering, and probably could improve cache use:
CPU B which takes qdisc lock only for enqueuing now, would use it for
dequeuing too, plus if accidentally the next xmit goes to a different
tx queue, it could start before CPU A finishes. Otherwise it would
simply wait for CPU A (without tx lock contention). Of course it
needs testing... 

Cheers,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html