[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090728.183451.93398827.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: krkumar2@...ibm.com, jarkao2@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Don't run __qdisc_run() on a stopped TX queue
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:25:23 +0800
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 06:06:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> More interesting to me is the case where the queue is not
>> filled up, or is very nearly so. :-)
>
> Do you mean the hardware queue? In that case perhaps Krishna's
> proposal of bypassing the qdisc would be the best.
Wouldn't that bypass any rate limiting enforcement done by
the qdisc too?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists