[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090728.192247.247655474.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: krkumar2@...ibm.com, jarkao2@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Don't run __qdisc_run() on a stopped TX queue
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:12:12 +0800
> One possibility is to partition the bandwidth equally between
> the queues and apply rate limiting locally within each queue.
Of course, you can solve the issue by redefining problem. :-)
However, such a semantic is not what users of this feature
are after. I doubt there would be much uptake of it even
if we did implement it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists