[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <869c36e20907310640m41163a2j57198d8ea5e91ba0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:40:51 -0400
From: Sumedha Gupta <2sumedha@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Bandwidth of NIC bonding/trunking
I configured bonding/trunking on a Netgear GS724TR switch. I am using
a 4-port NIC card using Intel Corporation 82571EB ethernet controller
on machine X with all four ports connected to the switch. There are
four client machines (A, B, C, D) also connected to the switch.
iperf is running on machine X as a server and machines A, B, C, D are
running as iperf clients:
With round robin, I consistently get:
Interval Transfer Bandwidth
0.0-10.0 sec 992 MBytes 831 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 989 MBytes 828 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 1019 MBytes 854 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 965 MBytes 808 Mbits/sec
However with XOR, I am not getting enough bandwidth:
0.0-10.0 sec 619 MBytes 519 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 398 MBytes 333 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 338 MBytes 283 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 612 MBytes 513 Mbits/sec
Similar results with transmit load balancing (tlb), 802.3ad, active
backup and broadcast:
0.0-10.5 sec 421 MBytes 336 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.1 sec 323 MBytes 269 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 301 MBytes 252 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 405 MBytes 339 Mbits/sec
Although, with adaptive load balancing I was constantly getting
perfect bandwidth:
0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 937 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 937 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 937 Mbits/sec
0.0-10.0 sec 1.09 GBytes 937 Mbits/sec
I wanted to know if so much change with mode change in bonding is
expected or did I configure something wrong in the switch which is
causing xor, tlb, 802.3ad etc. to not work properly?
Thanks,
Sumedha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists