[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090804.115741.17537444.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ralf@...ux-mips.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: NETROM: Don't use static buffer.
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:38:17 +0100
>
>> The use of a static buffer in nr_call_to_digi() to return its result is
>> not threadproof and can result in corruption if multiple threads are
>> trying to perform SIOCADDRT ioctls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
>
> So what frees up these now-dynamically-allocated digi objects?
Ralf, ping?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists