netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: implement a SO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090805.130405.242822698.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jengelh@...ozas.de
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: implement a SO_PROTOCOL getsockoption

From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Date: Tue,  4 Aug 2009 19:28:28 +0200

> Similar to SO_TYPE returning the socket type, SO_PROTOCOL allows to
> retrieve the protocol used with a given socket.
> 
> I am not quite sure why we have that-many copies of socket.h, and why
> the values are not the same on all arches either, but for where hex
> numbers dominate, I use 0x1029 for SO_PROTOCOL as that seems to be
> the next free unused number across a bunch of operating systems, or
> so Google results make me want to believe. SO_PROTOCOL for others
> just uses the next free Linux number, 38.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>

Applied to net-next-2.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html