[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090805.202226.24204308.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dbaryshkov@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, slapin@...fans.org,
linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] documentation: fix wrt. headers rename
From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:28:17 +0400
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
What are you generating these patches against?
> @@ -72,5 +72,4 @@ SoftMAC
> We are going to provide intermediate layer implementing IEEE 802.15.4 MAC
> in software. This is currently WIP.
>
> -See header include/net/ieee802154/mac802154.h and several drivers in
> -drivers/ieee802154/
> +See header include/net/mac802154.h and several drivers in drivers/ieee802154/.
In net-2.6, and in Linus's tree as well, that first sentence quoted has
a typo, "implementing" is misspelled, but in whatever you're patching
against the misspelling is fixed.
Looking at your pull request:
--------------------
The following changes since commit db71789c01ae7b641f83c5aa64e7df25122f4b28:
David S. Miller (1):
xfrm6: Fix xfrm6_policy.c build when SYSCTL disabled.
--------------------
You're submitting these for net-next-2.6? Didn't we just go back and
forth about trimming this patch series down to only pure bug fixes so
that they could go into net-2.6? Given that, why are you generating
this stuff against net-next-2.6?
I'm tossing this entire series again, this is beyond frustrating.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists