netdev - Forgot "[PATCH]" - Re: Use correct NET_RX_* returns for atalk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090807200434.818e8159.lk-netdev@lk-netdev.nosense.org>
Date:	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:04:34 +0930
From:	Mark Smith <lk-netdev@...netdev.nosense.org>
To:	Mark Smith <lk-netdev@...netdev.nosense.org>
Cc:	acme@...stprotocols.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Forgot "[PATCH]" - Re: Use correct NET_RX_* returns for atalk_rcv()

On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 18:51:22 +0930
Mark Smith <lk-netdev@...netdev.nosense.org> wrote:

> 
>     In all rx'd SKB cases, atalk_rcv() either eventually jumps to or falls through
>     to the label out:, which  returns numeric 0. Numeric 0 corresponds to
>     NET_RX_SUCCESS, which is incorrect in failed SKB cases.

<snip>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html