[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090809.215246.48399343.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, paul.moore@...com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] tun: Cleanup error handling in tun_set_iff()
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:22:42 -0700
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>
>> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:22:44 +1000
>>
>>> tun: Extend RTNL lock coverage over whole ioctl
>>>
>>> As it is, parts of the ioctl runs under the RTNL and parts of
>>> it do not. The unlocked section is still protected by the BKL,
>>> but there can be subtle races. For example, Eric Biederman and
>>> Paul Moore observed that if two threads tried to create two tun
>>> devices on the same file descriptor, then unexpected results
>>> may occur.
>>>
>>> As there isn't anything in the ioctl that is expected to sleep
>>> indefinitely, we can prevent this from occurring by extending
>>> the RTNL lock coverage.
>>>
>>> This also allows to get rid of the BKL.
>>>
>>> Finally, I changed tun_get_iff to take a tun device in order to
>>> avoid calling tun_put which would dead-lockt as it also tries to
>>> take the RTNL lock.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>>
>> This looks good after a quick audit, Eric what say you?
>
> Looks good to me.
Applied, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists