[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250094662.31650.24.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:31:02 -0500
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>, libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org,
Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dsd@...top.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas: name the network device wlan%d
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 10:34 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 04:13:32PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > Devices created by the libertas driver are currently called eth%d. Which
> > is wrong, because the device does not at all have anything to do with
> > Ethernet. And it is also confusing when used on devices with more than
> > one network device.
> >
> > Fix this by calling it wlan%d.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
> > Cc: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> > Cc: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>
> I'm fine with changing it, but it isn't really wrong either -- it's
> just a name, and afterall in most cases all the user will see is
> ethernet frames.
>
> Comments from the libertas driver crew?
I don't care either way, it's completely historical. Most of the
fullmac drivers used 'eth' back when. Might want to get buy-in from the
OLPC crew since they probably have the most deployed units using
libertas (cc-ed Daniel Drake).
Daniel, is it a problem for you guys if the libertas wifi interface name
went from 'eth' -> 'wlan' ? Mesh name would be unchanged.
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists