[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090813192326.GA32435@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:23:26 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 8139cp dma-debug warning.
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> :
[...]
> > @@ -549,8 +549,7 @@ rx_status_loop:
> > pr_debug("%s: rx slot %d status 0x%x len %d\n",
> > dev->name, rx_tail, status, len);
> >
> > - buflen = cp->rx_buf_sz + NET_IP_ALIGN;
> > - new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, buflen);
> > + new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, buflen + NET_IP_ALIGN);
> > if (!new_skb) {
> > dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> > goto rx_next;
>
> Below this, we're still doing an skb_reserve(NET_IP_ALIGN) on new_skb.
> Although the mapping is now constantly sized, aren't we still wastefully
> bumping the data/tail of the skb twice ?
$ grep -n NET_IP_ALIGN drivers/net/8139cp.c
552: new_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, buflen + NET_IP_ALIGN);
558: skb_reserve(new_skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
1059: skb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, cp->rx_buf_sz + NET_IP_ALIGN);
1063: skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
I do not get it : netdev_alloc_skb allocates but it does not "bump" as
skb_reserve does (and skb_reserve does not allocate). Where would the
double bump come from ?
The mapping is constantly sized but we want the ethernet header following
IP data to be evenly aligned and thus the mapping to be oddly aligned.
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists