[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090813.131328.70892070.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de
Cc: slot.daniel@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4, linux-2.6.30.4
From: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@...s.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:40:42 +0200
> David Miller schrieb:
>> From: Daniel Slot <slot.daniel@...il.com>
>> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:47:44 +0200
>>
>>> RFC 4653 specifies Non-Congestion Robustness (NCR) for TCP.
>>> In the absence of explicit congestion notification from the network, TCP
>>> uses loss as an indication of congestion.
>>> One of the ways TCP detects loss is using the arrival of three duplicate
>>> acknowledgments.
>>> However, this heuristic is not always correct,
>>> notably in the case when network paths reorder segments (for whatever
>>> reason), resulting in degraded performance.
>>
>> Linux's TCP stack already has sophisticated reordering detection.รค
>
>
> Hmm, sophisticated? Sorry, it seemed pretty rudimental/random to me.
It's more sophisticated than what you're proposing, which is a hammer
which requires intervention on the part of the application.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists