netdev - Re: [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A847674.5030508@hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:24:20 -0400
From:	Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
	Jens Rosenboom <jens@...one.net>,
	Linux Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses?

Joe Perches wrote:
> I suppose ipv6_addr_v4mapped(addr) could be tested instead
> 
> Perhaps this on top of last:
> 
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index dd02842..7ce34a7 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <net/ipv6.h>

I was trying to avoid this by open-coding the v4mapped check, didn't
know if IPv6-specific headers should be pulled-into this generic
code, even though we're printing IPv6 addresses.

-Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html