[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250195675.28285.128.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:34:35 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
Cc: Jens Rosenboom <jens@...one.net>,
Linux Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ipv6: Change %pI6 format to output compacted addresses?
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:24 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
> Is your arch "um"? Seems like those are only defined there, I'm building
> a straight x86 kernel.
Nope.
I did make allyesconfig ; make lib/vsprintf.o lib ctype.o
allnoconfig works though.
> This core dumps when running "test", I'm still trying to track down why.
missing return on ip_addr_string
> I think we're thinking too hard about this, I would think we'd always
> want to print the shortened IPv6 address in debugging messages with %pI6.
True, but you can't tell in sprintf as it's used in seq.
for instance:
net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c: seq_printf(m, "%s %pI6 %s\n", im->m_class, &addr, dom);
> The %pi6 places need to stay since they're an API to userspace. I don't
> think we need the extra "c" and "c4" support.
I'm pretty sure it can't change and a new form is needed
so %pi6c should be OK.
I'd rather not use another %p<foo> letter.
> One comment on a quick scan of the code:
> ip6_addr[8 * 5] is fine here, we won't ever have all eight plus an IPv4 address.
I'm fixing it up and will resubmit something working in a little while.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists