netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: Add ftracer to help optimize process scheduling based on incomming frame allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090813104204.GA16095@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:42:04 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: Add ftracer to help optimize process
	scheduling based on incomming frame allocations

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:15:15PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:21:30 -0400
> 
> > Tested by me, working well, applies against the head of the net-next tree
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> 
> For some reason they don't apply cleanly to net-next-2.6, probably
> because of the net-2.6 merge I did recently.
> 
> Neil, could you please respin, and also could you please not
> use the same subject line for all 3 patches?  That becomes the
> commit message header, and it should be unique for each patch
> since each patch does something different. :)
> 
> 
> 
Sure, no problem, I'll respin them all today and repost.
Thanks!
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html