[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A8AA0C6.805@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:38:30 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <GHaskins@...ell.com>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, gregory.haskins@...il.com,
alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, mst@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model
On 08/18/2009 03:36 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Yeah, I agree. I am not advocating we expend energy on this now. But my thoughts at the time were that that particular problem can be solved at io-setup time with some kind of call to qualify the address.
>
> Iow: a slow path call with the address would return flags on whether iowrite() should do a real io, or a IOoHC.
>
Yes, it could work, though we'd need somewhere to stow this
information. IIRC Arnd suggested a bit from the address itself.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists