netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH V2] lib/vsprintf.c: Add struct sockaddr * "%pN<foo>" output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090819.212941.235652305.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joe@...ches.com
Cc:	chuck.lever@...cle.com, jens@...one.net, brian.haley@...com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] lib/vsprintf.c: Add struct sockaddr *
 "%pN<foo>" output

From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:24:06 -0700

> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 15:36 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > Having a hexadecimal port number option  
>> > might be more useful.  The hexadecimal form is also used by the  
>> > kernel's RPC implementation, fwiw.
>> 
>> Easy enough.
> 
> Do you have an opinion on this style patch to lib/vsprint?
> Where does it fall on the useless <-> desirable scale?

Who me?

I'm just following this thread loosely, and just plan to review it
on a whole once things seem to quiet down and the major issues
seem to be worked out.

I really have no hard opinion on anything like this, sorry for
the lack of feedback, I simply have none :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html