lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:11:52 +0200
From:	"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@...foot.com>
To:	brian.haley@...com, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shanwei@...fujitsu.com
Subject: IPV6_RTHDR with a type-0 routing header

Hi,

I've tried attaching a type-0 routing header to my IPv6 packets with
setsockopt(..., IPV6_RTHDR, ...), but the kernel just returns EINVAL.
looking at the source, it seems it simply refuses anything that's not type-2;
should that really be right? I found the following commit:

  http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2008/11/11/4064594

However, it only seems to change EPERM into EINVAL. I don't see any
reasonable explanation why it should not be simply success; in fact, RFC 3452
only seems to talk about using type-0 headers with this option.

Any ideas?

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ