[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1250772824.9489.3.camel@fnki-nb00130>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:53:44 +0200
From: Jens Rosenboom <jens@...one.net>
To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@...foot.com>
Cc: RĂ©mi Denis-Courmont <remi@...lab.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IPV6_RTHDR with a type-0 routing header
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:39 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:18:20PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > Hm, OK. And no replacement has been proposed, the deprecation RFC just refers
> > to "future routing headers"...
>
> It looks like I can use destination options instead, but those don't seem to
> be too easy to use either. The kernel seems to demand that I put eight bytes
> of padding at the end?
>
> #define ipv6_optlen(p) (((p)->hdrlen+1) << 3)
>
> Why the +1?
Because that matches the definition of the hdrlen field in RFC2460.
> FWIW, the program I try to run is at http://home.samfundet.no/~sesse/v6fun.c .
> If I replace "len" in the setsockopt call by "len + 8", the program runs and
> the packets get the right option attached -- but also eight padding bytes.
ERROR 404: Not Found.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists